
In cricket, Leg Before Wicket (LBW) is a big way to get a batter out, but it all comes down to what the umpire thinks after the fielding team appeals. Basically, if the ball hits the batter’s body instead of the wicket (but not their hand holding the bat), the umpire can call them out LBW. They look at things like where the ball bounced, if it was in line with the wickets, where it was going after it hit the batter, and what the batter was trying to do.
The LBW rule came about way back in 1774 because batters started using their pads to protect the wicket. Since then, they’ve tweaked the rules a few times to make things clearer about where the ball lands and what the batter is up to. For almost 100 years, the LBW rule stayed pretty much the same after 1839.
As the 1800s went on, batters got good at using their pads to avoid getting out. Even though they tried to change the rule a bunch of times, it wasn’t until 1935 that they finally said a batter could be out LBW even if the ball bounced outside the off-stump line. Some people complained that this made the game less fun because it helped defensive players more than leg spin bowlers.
They changed it again in 1972 to deal with all the pad-play. The rule they came up with then is still around today: you can get a batter out LBW if they don’t even try to hit the ball with their bat in certain situations.
Since the 90s, we’ve had TV replays and ball-tracking tech, which has meant more LBW decisions in big games. But people still argue about how accurate this tech is and what it means for the game. Gerald Brodribb said it best in his 1995 look at cricket laws: LBW has always been a tricky subject because it’s so complicated. Regular fans often don’t get it, and it’s caused fights between fans, the people in charge, and the commentators. Sometimes, LBW calls have even made crowds angry, and the number of LBW dismissals has been going up for years.
LBW is basically when a batter gets out because the ball hits their leg instead of their bat. The rule is Law 36 in the official cricket rulebook (thanks, MCC!). To get a batter out LBW, the fielding side has to appeal to the umpire. One thing to remember: if the bowler bowls a no-ball, LBW is off the table, no matter what.
For a batter to be given out LBW, a few things need to line up:
Also, if a batter doesn’t even try to hit the ball and it hits them outside the line of the stumps but would’ve hit the wicket, they can be out LBW.
The umpire figures that the ball would’ve kept going in the same direction after hitting the batter, even if it might have bounced before hitting the stumps.
A batter can get out LBW even if the ball misses their leg. If the ball lands on the leg side of the stumps, LBW is a no-go. If a batter tries to hit the ball but it hits them outside the off stump line, they’re safe from LBW.
Tricky Situations
Things get iffy when batters switch hit or reverse sweep (changing from right- to left-handed). The off side is determined by how the batter is standing when the bowler starts running up to bowl.
Umpires have a lot to consider when making LBW calls. They look at the angle and swing of the ball, how high it hit the batter, and how far away the batter was from the wicket. The umpire needs to figure out if the ball would’ve hit or missed the stumps. It’s easier when the ball hits the batter straightaway, but it gets tough when there’s not much time between the ball bouncing and hitting the batter.
The LBW rule in cricket goes way back to the 1700s when the rules weren’t really set. Funny enough, the first set of rules from 1744 didn’t even mention LBW. Back then, bats were curved, so players couldn’t really stand right in front of the wickets anyway.
But as bats got straighter, players started standing closer to the wickets. People got worried that they might block the ball from hitting the wickets on goal. So, in 1774, they changed the rules to say a batter was out if they intentionally blocked the ball with their leg. Even though they tried to fix the problem, it was still confusing because umpires had to guess what the batter was trying to do.
Over the next few years, they tried to make the LBW rule easier to understand. In 1823, they said the ball had to go straight to the wicket, which was supposed to help umpires. But it was still not clear, because umpires didn’t agree on if the ball had to travel straight from the bowler to the wicket or between the wickets.
In 1839, the Marylebone Cricket Club (MCC), which makes the cricket rules, said that the ball had to be pitched between the wickets and going to hit the stumps, no matter how it got there from the bowler.
Even though the 1839 rule helped a bit, people kept arguing about LBW through the late 1800s and early 1900s. There were a lot of LBW dismissals, which made people think players were just using their pads to defend too much.
People had ideas to stop pad-play and give bowlers a better chance. In 1888, some cricket clubs said that a batter should be out if they blocked a ball that would have hit the wicket, no matter where the ball bounced. But those ideas didn’t get enough support to change the rules.
Some famous cricketers wanted similar changes to make the LBW rule stricter and stop defensive play. They tried a lot to change it, even suggesting making the stumps bigger, but nothing really changed.
Back in the ’50s and ’60s, pad-play became a common tactic in cricket, mostly on tough pitches. People thought it was a bad way to play, so they changed the rules to stop it and help leg spin bowlers.
They tweaked the LBW law to deal with pad-play. It started in Australia and the West Indies in 1969-70, then in England in 1970. If a ball landed in line with the wickets or outside off stump and the umpire thought the batter wasn’t really trying to hit it, they could call LBW.
The goal was to get batters to play more aggressively and make the game better. But at first, fewer LBW’s were called. Australia wanted to go back to the old rule where a batter could be out LBW if the ball landed outside the stumps and hit any part of their body (except their hands). This change happened worldwide in 1972, and LBW dismissals went up a lot.
After 1993, LBW dismissals went up in English cricket because ball-tracking tech like Hawk-Eye was used on TV. Cricket fans trusted this tech, which showed that more balls hitting a stretched-out leg would have hit the stumps.
Umpires knew this, so they understood better which balls would hit the stumps. They started calling more LBWs, especially when batters were further from the stumps. This happened in international cricket too, where tech affected how umpires thought, which helped spin bowlers.
In 2009, the ICC started using the Umpire Decision Review System (DRS). This lets teams challenge the umpire’s calls using replays and ball-tracking. LBW calls happened more often because umpires knew their mistakes could be checked. Some people say DRS is not consistent, and they doubt the accuracy of ball-tracking. But the ICC says it’s accurate.
Over the years, the Leg Before Wicket (LBW) rule has seen some changes. Douglas Miller did a study back in 2011 where he checked out LBW dismissals in English county cricket. Turns out, they went up bit by bit from the 1920s to the 2010s. Just before 2010, almost 19% of outs were LBW. That’s a big jump!
Miller also found out that team captains had something to do with LBW calls. Captains of county teams didn’t get out LBW as much when they were batting. But when they were bowling, they got more batters out LBW. This might be because back in the day, umpires kind of listened to what captains said. Before 1963, they were a bit nicer to amateur cricketers ’cause those guys had some say in who got to be an umpire.
Around the world, LBW happened more in matches in India and nearby countries. But batters from around there didn’t get out LBW as often, no matter where the game was. So, it looks like how you play and how umpires call it can be different depending on where you are.
LBW calls are always a hot topic. People say it’s one of the hardest rules to get your head around in cricket, like the offside rule in soccer. It’s so tricky that people who don’t watch cricket all the time get confused.
The thing is, umpires have to guess what would have happened, not just what did. They have to figure out if the ball bounced outside the leg stump and whether the batter was trying to hit the ball or not.
Umpires get yelled at all the time by players, commentators, and fans about LBW calls. Back in the day, these arguments even led to protests and fights. One time, in 1996, there was a One Day International in India where Mohammad Azharuddin got a bad LBW call. The crowd went crazy, threw stuff on the field, and stopped the game for a while.
So, LBW is still a big deal in cricket. It’s changed over time, and it’s always controversial. Players, officials, and fans will probably keep talking about it for a long time.
In cricket, when we talk about impact in the LBW (Leg Before Wicket) rule, we’re talking about the exact second the ball hits the batter’s body, usually around the knee area. That moment is super important for deciding if the batter is out or not.
LBW is a way for the team in the field to get a batter out. It happens when the ball hits the batter’s leg or body instead of the bat. But, the batter only gets called out LBW if a few things line up. This has to do with where the ball hits the batter, where the ball was going, and where the batter was standing compared to the wickets.
If the ball hits any part of the batter’s leg or body below the knee, and the umpire thinks the ball would have hit the wickets if the leg hadn’t been there, then the batter can be out LBW. This point of impact is a big deal for the umpire when they’re making the call.
LBW calls can be tricky. Umpires have to think about a bunch of things before calling a batter out. This includes where the ball was headed, how the batter was standing, if the batter tried to hit the ball, and if the ball was going to hit the wickets.
So, while impact in LBW mainly means when the ball hits the batter, it’s more than just that single point. The final call is based on everything that happened, making sure the call makes sense with the whole play.
Stay informed with the latest, most reliable news and updates—fresh on our site.

Sign up to receive the latest news, updates, and insights directly to your inbox.